LiveSearch

Powered by vanilla & lovin' it!

    •  
      CommentAuthormick
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008 edited
     
    chicken and i had a brief talk.

    ok.. i twitted him about a phrase... and it was meant as a tease, but may have seemed like i was bracing him.


    again.. no way do i think you're homophobic in any way shape or form, chicken. ok?


    gay
    ghey
    ghay
    homosexual

    used to label something as useless, or stupid or something "not liked"

    any one of those words or phrases can be NOT pejorative in context.

    that context is when the person using them has paid their dues. [example: i don't get to call my pals "nigger". i haven't paid any "nigger" dues, and it would be offensive. people, who among themselves have paid those dues, own that word.


    many of you know that i'm as bi as they come. my love interest is male, but i didn't fall for him because of his dick, it was his mind and heart that snared me. i've had many more women lovers than men, and until she was 12, my daughter figured i was all dyke.

    when i'm with my gay friends, and one of them rolls their eyes at another and says "that's SO gay!", it might be a fashion or behavioural criticism, but it's affectionate and ... everyone is on the same page. THEY own that word.]

    here, and almost anywhere online, using gay or any of the devious little spelling tricks (devised to get past censors in online gaming) comes across as pejorative. it feels creepy, and gives the site a subtle .. or not so subtle message that it's not a place where being gay is a good or welcome thing.

    in the "real world", among like-minded friends what are all either GLBT or GLBT-friendly, when you all have the same cues, can look each other in the eye, and know that you're accepted and respected, teasing each other with "that's so gay" works just fine.

    here online, without those cues it's too easy to misunderstand.

    these people, these fora (i'm speaking longtime, here) have always been respectful of people's sexual orientations.


    my daughter says to blame a tv show called South Park for the ... what she calls "brat acceptance" of homophobic language. it's like the author's joke got perverted. i dunno; i've never seen it.

    i've also been told that kids say "oh no, it's not homophobic to neg something by saying it's gay; that just means it's lame". ok.. lame is pretty crappy to hear, too.. if you are truly lamed. that just implies that being gay is synonymous with being somehow imperfect, which is BS.

    many of us have kids. approximately 10% of them will be gay in some way. none of them will be lame or useless or wrong, unless you tell them they are.



    i really really REALLY don't think there is any rampant homophobia here, but i do see the creep of anti-gay slang into the language we use.





    :) i'm working on getting "lame" out of my vocabulary.


    respect, my friends. could we talk about this?
    •  
      CommentAuthorchris
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    mick said......THEY own that word....


    i disagree with that right there.
    •  
      CommentAuthormick
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    can you expand on that, chris?

    my experience, and that of the people around me is different, but i only know what i know, and it's a great big world. :)
    •  
      CommentAuthorchicken
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    chris said...
    mick said......THEY own that word....


    i disagree with that right there.
    me 2

    In the English language, "gay" is an adjective that in modern usage refers to homosexuality. In earlier and in literary usage, the word means "carefree," "happy," or "bright and showy". The word started to acquire sexual connotations in the late 17th century and finally it began to be used in reference to homosexuality in particular from the early 20th century, from the 1920s at the latest. Today, the words gay man and lesbian are the most recommended words to use to describe people attracted to members of the same sex[1].

    On the other hand when used with a derisive attitude (e.g. "that was so gay"), the word gay is pejorative. According to BBC among younger generations in UK, the word 'gay' sometimes is used in a non-sexual pejorative meaning, equivalent to 'rubbish' or 'stupid'.[2].

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay
    •  
      CommentAuthorchris
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    if people who are homosexual are allowed to use that word in such a way, then everyone else is too ;)
    •  
      CommentAuthormick
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008 edited
     
    ok, so it's not a slur?

    saying something is gay really does mean it's a good thing?
    •  
      CommentAuthorchicken
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    as you can see the meaning of the word "gay" has evolved over the years. i guess it's evolving again.
    •  
      CommentAuthormick
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    i'm of the ... present... opinion that the "According to BBC among younger generations in UK, the word 'gay' sometimes is used in a non-sexual pejorative meaning, equivalent to 'rubbish' or 'stupid " is a Slanguage dodge.
    •  
      CommentAuthorchicken
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    chris said...if people who are homosexual are allowed to use that word in such a way, then everyone else is too ;)
    there's no way that I will ever use the word "nigger" though, even though African-Americans use it among themselves. The word "nigger" has a completely different history.
    •  
      CommentAuthorchris
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    segregation in language?
    •  
      CommentAuthornicko
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    IF somebody used the term hetero to describe something rubbish I would not be offended.

    Gay / ghey / ghay as a term for something rubbish is also used by my gay friends.

    I am not homophobic or racist.
    •  
      CommentAuthorchris
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    Look what we've done to the old mother tongue,
    it's a crime the way we've misused it.
    It's been totally diswabled, pulverized and gollywobbled,
    We've strangled, fangled, mangled and abused it.

    Do you remember the day when if you said that you were gay
    It meant with joy you could sing and shout
    A fairy was enchanting and dressing up and camping
    was something you did with the scouts.
    That carefree age when an urgent case of aids
    Was powdered milk we sent to the Sahara
    A fruit was something nice to eat a poof was something for your feet
    And a queen was an old tart in a tiarra.
    •  
      CommentAuthormick
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008 edited
     
    there's no way that I will ever use the word "nigger" though, even though African-Americans use it among themselves. The word "nigger" has a completely different history.

    does it?

    it's another word used to marginalize and belittle and separate.

    i, personally, like "homo" better than "queer" or "gay", because i like the words queer and gay, and have to not use them sometimes when it seems like the perfect word.

    ideally, there'd be no question of needing a special designation for any of the 5 known "sexes" (possibly more), unless you were seeking a mate.
    •  
      CommentAuthorchris
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    i think that 'not allowing' one group of people to use a word, but 'allowing' another group to use the word is pretty disgusting.
    •  
      CommentAuthorchris
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    but i do agree that 'casual slang can seem homophobic on the internets' ;)
    •  
      CommentAuthorchicken
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    well i'm glad we sorted that out then.

    which topic now? :)
    •  
      CommentAuthormick
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    nicko, i know you're not homophobic or racist, but in an online forum, using certain forms of language can have that appearance.

    people cruise this site all the time. if the language we use gives us the appearance of not being gay-friendly, then possibly we miss out on a new member or contributor.

    i get it, my friends, that you feel like i'm over-thinking this.

    but.... i've felt it, and had to remind myself who was speaking and what i know about them. others who know you or me less well can only read and take the words at face value.
    •  
      CommentAuthormick
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    chris, in principle i agree with you, but honestly.... you or i do not have the cred to use "nigger". there really are dues to pay in the case of some ways of speaking. it's like an "in-group", for sure, but the "in" is the experience of discrimination and marginalization.
    •  
      CommentAuthorchris
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    mick said...people cruise this site all the time.

    hehe :D
    •  
      CommentAuthormick
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    :) and. chicken.. i really do love you for lots of reasons. not least is your ability to make me think things through so i can try to communicate what i feel.


    actually.. truly... i do love and respect you all, and i do feel safe here.
    •  
      CommentAuthornicko
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    I do get upset when people are racist towards my wife... however, they are people who generally don't know her.
    •  
      CommentAuthorchris
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008 edited
     
    mick said...chris, in principle i agree with you, but honestly.... you or i do not have the cred to use "nigger". there really are dues to pay in the case of some ways of speaking. it's like an "in-group", for sure, but the "in" is the experience of discrimination and marginalization.

    no one has the 'cred' to use that word.

    though, i do believe that if it was more widely used (yes, by whitey, there!), in the same way as the "in-group" use it, then most of the 'bad' connotations of the word would disappear.

    which brings me back to the point that allowing one group of people to use a word but not others, is bad. that, there, is segregation, discrimination, and is pretty gay ;)
    •  
      CommentAuthornicko
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    what chris said
    •  
      CommentAuthorelliott-20
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    I find this whole subject like muddy waters and I don't want to wade too deep, but...

    ...for me a word is a word. However' its meaning is purely derived from the venom (or love) that is contained within its passing through the teeth. No one, group or movement can 'own' words and I miss the point when it's "okay" for a gay man to call another gay man a 'poof' but not for anyone else. Likewise when black guys call their mates niggers its okay, but if I were to utter the word I would be labeled a racist/homophobic/sexist etc. yeah you get the point.

    It's segregation by language.

    Should I feel insulted if someone discriminated against the fact I'm left handed? It used to happen and more recent than you may think. We're not talking witchcraft age either but the point is it is now excepted that some people are left handed, it goes total un-noticed.

    I suppose what I am trying to say is that the more people still make a point about miss-use of words the more it remains a no-no. Until it becomes the norm, and to be honest, the use of 'gay' as something that is crap by kids is probably removing that stigma of homosexuality, the more it will become excepted to be 'gay'.

    That said, email and internets suffers from a lack of punctuation and exclamation that which spoken words contain that avoids such missunderstandings.

    Does that make sense?
    •  
      CommentAuthorchris
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    nicko said...what chris said

    you may want to watch out - i edited :D
    •  
      CommentAuthorelliott-20
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    holy shit it took me 20 minutes to write that post and look what happens
    •  
      CommentAuthorchris
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    elliott-20 said...holy shit it took me 20 minutes to write that post and look what happens
    maybe if you were normal-handed would have been able to type quicker :p

    it makes sense though, for sure.
    •  
      CommentAuthormick
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    ^ fair point.

    ....in my own experience, but i've never lived anywhere that had a large black population and the history of oppression and hatred behind the word.

    it's one of those "claim it or it will be used against you" things, i'm pretty sure.

    nicko... we are surrounded by people online who don't know us. not what colour we are, or if we're religious, or what our gender orientation is, or our politics.. until they get to know us.


    online communication can be really tough and it's easy to be misunderstood when all we have is text. :)
    •  
      CommentAuthorVe.
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    (bravo,elliot-20)(By and large I am with you on nearly all points in your post)

    And that will be that for my entry into this discuss.
    •  
      CommentAuthormick
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008 edited
     
    chris said...


    no one has the 'cred' to use that word.


    chris, in principle i agree with you, but honestly.... you or i do not have the cred to use "nigger". there really are dues to pay in the case of some ways of speaking. it's like an "in-group", for sure, but the "in" is the experience of discrimination and marginalization.
    •  
      CommentAuthornicko
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    I meant IRL mick, but yeah... I agree
    •  
      CommentAuthormick
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    fuck me! LOL

    i am such a slow typist. ;)

    catching up.... *puff puff puff*
    •  
      CommentAuthormick
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    respect, elliot, but i disagree.

    it doesn't serve to make being gay more acceptable, it just makes it more acceptable to call things or people gay, in a negative way.
    •  
      CommentAuthormick
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    "gay" is positive, darn it.
    •  
      CommentAuthorchris
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    gay can be both positive and negative.
    •  
      CommentAuthormick
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    one last thought before i have to leave. :)

    words that are used to separate people ... "gay" and "nigger" are the present examples... were not coined by the people they were used on. those words were used to abuse.

    those words were later appropriated in an attempt to make something positive out of something ugly and mean-spirited. "i'm gay and i'm proud" means something to me. saying that "gay" is just harmless slang for rubbish just trashes all the pain and suffering that went into finding a way to live with pride in a sometimes very ugly world.



    later, my friends.



    x
    •  
      CommentAuthorelliott-20
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    chris said...
    elliott-20 said...holy shit it took me 20 minutes to write that post and look what happens
    maybe if you were normal-handed would have been able to type quicker :p


    :happy: nice
    •  
      CommentAuthornicko
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    ha ha
    • CommentAuthorrbernato
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    I don't know if my contribution will help to keep this discussion somewhat on track, but I have a good friend that cracks heterosexual jokes ... he is gay, in case you wonder.

    In my opinion that is a good way of re-appropriation in the sense that if you can have homosexuals as subjects/targets of jokes you might as well make jokes about the heterosexuals in turn.

    hm, ok, that was kinda random and confusing without context. But I think it (marginally) ties in with the discussion about using "nigger" and "gay" in different contexts and how it might feel being called that and knowing about the connotations. I don't care for heterosexual jokes, but I don't crack gay jokes either, like I don't indulge in general racist jokes (like jokes involving jews or blondes for that matter – though I have a higher tolerance for blondes jokes :tongue: )

    about 10% of all males are homosexual. in a restaurant there are 26 men, how many of them are gay?
    two of them are gay, the other 24 don't know yet.
  1.  
    I think the using gay as a negative evolved from the term queer(ie. out of the ordinary, curious)...
    i guess people started using it as a derogatory slang against homosexuals, as they wanted to deny
    the normalcy of homosexuality

    i don't see either or as being 'anti-gay' nowadays...so i don'ttake offense to it, im not gay, but do have friends
    of both genders who are, i don'tuse the term for no other reason that it never really appealed to me
    never used the n-word either, that word just seems inappropriate-it only has one meaning and its not nice

    My all round favorite swear word is Fuck, it can mean anything just apply it to the context
    i say effin a lot too, even type it(guess it could be F-In too...i just like effin~and thats how i picture it in my brain when i say it~always in all lowercase letters, the font varies~)
    Fuck All, Fuck This, effin sweet, Fuck That Fucking Fuckhole, Fuck It, Fuck em all, Hell Fucken Yah...eh you get the point

    I am also very fond of bullstuff as i cant stand the spoken word 'shit'...i just don'tlike the way it sounds

    anyway~fuck all this bull stuff

    I'm sure if there was any rampant homophobia, or racism posted on the board it would be either ignored or attacked to the point of said person would stop posting
    or hopefully elevate his/her level of discussion beyond that point

    I kind of skkimmed this topic a bit, so if repeated anything forgive the O, but I actually have some stuff to do today, no time for all this fazyluckerness

    946 am slightly drunk~I love you all, mick cheer up, and when your friends do something stupid stop calling them orsons!
  2.  
    Two nations divided by a common language
    And about 200 years of new songs and dances
    but the difference is language
    and just the bits you got wrong
    cuz we were the ones who invented the language.
    •  
      CommentAuthorjussi-k
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    This thread is so gay.
    •  
      CommentAuthorchicken
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    :D
    •  
      CommentAuthorchris
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    if this was QI, the alarms would be ringing for juzz' post :D
    • CommentAuthorBiff
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    What? People can be dicks to other people on the internet?

    No. No way.
    •  
      CommentAuthorwebsnap
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    First some back ground:

    I am a Canadian born "dark tinted" portuguese man due to my grandmother being black and I had my own "dues-paying" names given to me as I was always the odd-one out in the portuguese community I was raised in. These names were given to me by kids and parents, needless to say – they were best-of-breed. My wife is Bi, my best friend is gay, growing up I thought I might have been gay (turns out I am just heavily metrosexual, which is a stupid word BTW since sex never factors into the definition, but I regress) and I have membership to two gay nightclubs (they play the best house).

    I choose to believe that "gay", to me, is one of those words with two meanings and try to leave it at that. The english language has many instances where two words sound or a spelt the same yet have completely different or varying meanings and I have decided long ago to include Gay in that list. I use "that's soooo gay" with my gay friends as well as without as i would know and no; two and to; whether and weather; read and read, I think you get my point. I do, however, gauge when I can use the word in that context depending on the company I am addressing, such as I wouldn't say something is "sooo gay" in front of my grandmother, just as I would replace "that's fucking great" with "wow, I really like that". Same with a work environment. I may subscribe to the concept that "gay" can be a dual definition word, my Human Resources may disagree and I have a mortgage to pay.

    One final note, while on label names, while comparing "nigger" and "gay" makes sense at first glance when you look deeper, it just doesn't have the same venom. The term "nigger" was given to a whole group of people who were owned and the word was labeling people as a commodity, like an extension of a cart or a broom. Most people thought people who were gay could be fixed back into "regular people", "niggers" were never considered people in there eyes to begin with. I have never seen "Gay" as a bad word, ever. I'll say it and write it as I see fit. I NEVER say the word "nigger" and I'll only type it in the context of this type of conversation and, in fact, I feel ill writing it as many times as I have. I don't even say it to my black friends who say it to me in an endearing context.

    my to sense (lol, get it... ah, never mind...)

    sorry for the long post
    • CommentAuthorBiff
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008
     
    homonyms FTW!

    (did you see what I did there?)
    •  
      CommentAuthorwebsnap
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008 edited
     
    lol
    (edit: no, wait... actually ... no)
    •  
      CommentAuthorflak
    • CommentTimeSep 16th 2008 edited
     
    I'm with chris, here (and those who said similar things). Nobody has the right to use those words, and I do my part by not using them (with the exception of this thread, ahem ;) ).

    I don't like the word 'nigger' just like I don't like the word 'cracker' (at least, when it's used with racial undertones). Frankly, it's not the word, it's the intent behind saying the word...as elliott said above.

    Every time someone from a particular group uses a word like that, it reminds me of that scene from Rush Hour, the first one...Chris Tucker goes into a bar, and says "What's up, my nigga?". Then, Jackie Chan, playing a character completely new to the western world, does the same, and they kick his ass.

    Well, they would kick his ass, except that he's Jackie Chan. :D

    •  
      CommentAuthormick
    • CommentTimeSep 18th 2008
     
    This is long, friends, but i’ll try to shush, after. i’d appreciate it if you read.


    elliot, i want to clarify a bit: “I miss the point when it's "okay" for a gay man to call another gay man a 'poof' but not for anyone else.” ......it’s like a family thing, or a bro thing. the last party i threw, when Alin walked in the door in pink pants, eyeshadow, and his shirt unbuttoned to show off his hairy chest, i exclaimed: ‘omg, it’s poof bear!”. that was a GOOD thing. when Fayad, who was staying with us, called his best friend, he greeted him with “hey, asshole!”. neither of those very ok utterances would have been cool or friendly out of context. you really do have a pass to jokingly insult your friends at times.

    :D the grin is for urban... the last line of the poem “ cuz we were the ones who invented the language.” in this case, “we” reinvented a slur and made it a point of identifiable pride.

    and a :p for jussi, who likes to prod at the sensitive bits and see what squirms.

    websnap, i totally agree with what you said about the diff between the sheer volume of mean ugly history around “nigger”. that doesn’t mean that people haven’t suffered and died because they were gay, but the point is righteous. i, too, abhore the word, but i also know people who are serious about removing the stigma by claiming it. it’s the same with me, except i’m so whitebread, no one ever calls me that. my best friend has very dark skin, and she’s not down with it either. others who i respect are. it’s a matter (imo) of when and with who you feel safe.

    what chris said about no one OWNING a word is really correct, but at the same time, words have a great deal of force in our world, and using pejorative slang to isolate and belittle is powerful. what i should have said was that in claiming “nigger” or “gay”, many people say they feel like they take back the power of those words and make them not hurtful to hear (because they’re going to hear them, you bet).

    Biff. :) this homofem giggled....